Players & agents

Choosing a club
means choosing a season.

A team’s true level, what its season holds, where it stands in its league: measured figures, recomputed after every matchday, so that a destination is chosen or a negotiation prepared on something more than instinct.

Valuation dossierContents
  • The club’s true levelAttacking and defensive strengthAvailable
  • Season projectionFinal position, Europe, relegationAvailable
  • League contextWhere the club stands among its rivalsAvailable
  • Strength of oppositionFixture list and level of upcoming opponentsAvailable
  • Player impactWhat he changes to his team’s goalsIn development
  • Likely playing timeCompetition for the position, use by the head coachIn development
Who it is for

Two decisions, the same figures.

Agents

Placing a player in the right club

  • Compare destinations: each club’s true level, beyond its current league position.
  • Project the club’s season: chances of Europe, relegation risk, likely final position.
  • Read the context: strength of the league, upcoming opponents, fixture list.
  • Build a valuation dossier: dated, sourced figures to put in front of a club.
Players

Knowing what you are walking into

  • Know where you are going: what the team is really worth, and what its season holds.
  • Prepare a negotiation: a performance bonus tied to Europe or survival is easier to negotiate once its probability is known.
  • Understand your impact: what you change to your team’s play. In development, see below.
Example, real data

Three destinations, side by side.

The strengths and projections published by our model, untouched. Choose a league and three clubs: level, projected season, likely final position. The comparison is made within a single league — our indices are read relative to its average.

Computed on 27 September 2026 · 5 matchdays played

Liverpool

6th in the table · 9 pts from 5 matches

Club level
4th by strength / 20
Attack
+33% goals scored
Defence
+2% goals conceded
Projected points
63
Champions League
42.0%
European cup
67.6%
Relegation
< 0.1%
Likely playing time
In development

Final position, across 50,000 simulated seasons

Chelsea

10th in the table · 7 pts from 5 matches

Club level
10th by strength / 20
Attack
+27% goals scored
Defence
+26% goals conceded
Projected points
53
Champions League
8.9%
European cup
23.2%
Relegation
2.2%
Likely playing time
In development

Final position, across 50,000 simulated seasons

Sunderland

14th in the table · 4 pts from 5 matches

Club level
16th by strength / 20
Attack
−5% goals scored
Defence
+16% goals conceded
Projected points
43
Champions League
1.1%
European cup
4.1%
Relegation
23.1%
Likely playing time
In development

Final position, across 50,000 simulated seasons

TitleChampions LeagueOther European cupMid-tableAutomatic relegation

Probability of playing in a European cup next season: 68% with Liverpool, 4% with Sunderland.

Attack and defence: deviation from the league average, adjusted for the quality of the opposition faced (a defence at “−10%” concedes 10% fewer goals than an average defence). “Level”: the club’s rank by these strengths, not by the table. Source: Rondo public feed (competition-classement).

Full transparency

What is delivered today, and what is not yet.

Available

The club and its league

Computed across twenty-four competitions, recomputed after every matchday.

Team strengths
Attack and defence estimated by a goals model, adjusted for the quality of the opposition.
Season projection
The full distribution of final positions, for leagues whose format lends itself to it.
League context and strength of opposition
Each club’s strength rank and, where the model publishes it, the probability of every upcoming match.
In development

The player himself

We are building a player-impact model: how far a team’s goals scored and conceded move depending on whether a given player is on the pitch. It does not yet feed into any client dossier.

Player impact
Measured in goals per match, comparable from one position to another.
Likely playing time
Competition for the position at the target club.
Predictive gain · on matches the model has never seen
Knowing the team’s style+1.18%
+ what the player actually produces+3.86%

Both models already know which teams are playing. Describing the team’s style improves the prediction slightly. Adding what each player produces triples the gain — and it holds out of sample, on matches held back during training. That is the evidence that the player signal is real, not a redescription of the team.

A first research result, on matches held out of training: an encouraging signal, not yet a product.

Formats

What you receive.

Analysis report

A written answer to a specific question: which club, in what context, with what chance of reaching which objective. Dated figures, with method and limitations included.

PDF dossier

A document ready to share with a player, his family or a club: the destinations compared, the charts, and the date of every computation.

Sessions with our team

Time set aside to read the figures together and test another destination or another assumption, ahead of a decision or a negotiation.

Rondo Research is not an agency and represents no player: we provide statistical estimates; the decision and the negotiation remain yours.

One player, several destinations?

Tell us which clubs you are comparing and what you need to decide. We will tell you what the figures can say about it, and what they cannot.