Media & newsrooms

The number that makes the story,
before kick-off.

Who will win the title, which match will be decided by the finest of margins, which side the table flatters: we model twenty-four competitions and deliver dated, verified probabilities and publication-ready graphics to your newsroom.

Real figures, recomputed matchday by matchdayPublic calibrationCredit “Rondo Research”

Who will be champions?

Ligue 1 2026/2027 · title probability, 50,000 simulated seasons

Rondo
Research
Paris Saint Germain6th · 8 pts70%
Monaco1st · 13 pts14%
Olympique Lyonnais2nd · 11 pts5.0%
LOSC Lille4th · 10 pts4.9%
Rennes5th · 10 pts2.6%
Paris3rd · 11 pts1.2%

The other 12 clubs combined: 2.4%

Source: Rondo Research · computed on 27 September 2026 · after 5 matchdays
24Competitions modelled
14Leagues projected
50,000Seasons simulated per league
2,094Calibration matches
What you publish

Six ways to feed a football section.

Everyone has the table. What your readers are missing is what happens next, and how likely it is. Everything comes from the same model, published and verified.

Pre-match probabilities

Every fixture in the leagues we cover, as soon as it enters the three-week window ahead.

  • Home win, draw, away win
  • Goal totals, both sides scoring
  • Most likely correct scores
Available

Season projections

Who will win the title, who qualifies for Europe, who goes down: 50,000 seasons simulated over the remaining fixtures.

  • Title, European qualification and relegation probabilities
  • Projected points, position by position
  • Leagues with a standard format
Available

Power rankings

Each team’s true strength, adjusted for the quality of its opponents — and the gap to the league table.

  • Measured attack and defence
  • Who is overperforming, who is underperforming
  • The angle the table does not give you
Available

Champions League simulation

Every club’s path from the league phase to the final, simulated on the competition’s actual format.

  • Top eight, play-offs, elimination
  • Round of 16, quarter-finals, semi-finals, title
  • Updated matchday by matchday
Available

Data stories

Data-led angles written by our team, ready for your journalists to run as they are or develop further.

  • The figure, its context, its limits
  • For a matchday, a derby, a run-in
  • Sourced and dated
On request

Expert commentary

A modeller on hand to explain a figure — in an interview, on air or while you prepare a piece.

  • What the model says, and what it does not
  • The methodology in plain language
  • Quotable as “Rondo Research”
On request
Live from the model

What you could have published this morning.

These graphics are not mock-ups: they are generated from the latest published model run and change with it. Under each one, the headline it lets you write.

The title race

Premier League 2026/2027 · title probability, 50,000 simulated seasons

Rondo
Research
Manchester City1st · 15 pts58%
Arsenal2nd · 12 pts31%
Brighton & Hove Albion3rd · 10 pts6.7%
Liverpool6th · 9 pts1.6%
Brentford4th · 9 pts1.0%

The other 15 clubs combined: 1.6%

Source: Rondo Research · computed on 27 September 2026 · after 5 matchdays

Possible headline: “Manchester City given a 58% chance of the title after 5 matchdays”.

Too close to call

Ligue 1 · Matchday 6 · Saturday 10 October, 20:45

Rondo
Research
Lorient12th in the table
vs
Paris3rd in the table
Lorient winDrawParis win
1.3–1.4Expected goals
51%Three or more goals
55%Both teams score
Most likely scores1-113%0-18.7%1-28.5%
Source: Rondo Research · computed on 27 September 2026 · Dixon-Coles model

Possible headline: “Lorient–Paris: even the favourites, Paris, are no better than 38%”.

The table lies

Ligue 1 · table position against strength measured by the model

Rondo
Research

Stronger than their position

Olympique Marseille17th in the table→4th on strength▲ 13
Lens15th in the table→3rd on strength▲ 12
Paris Saint Germain6th in the table→1st on strength▲ 5

Higher than their level

Angers SCO7th in the table→17th on strength▼ 10
Le Mans9th in the table→16th on strength▼ 7
Paris3rd in the table→9th on strength▼ 6
Source: Rondo Research · computed on 27 September 2026 · strength = attack and defence, adjusted for opponents

Possible headline: “Olympique Marseille: 17th in the table, 4th on strength”.

Formats

Delivered the way your newsroom works.

A graphic for print, a file for the subs’ desk, a feed for the website. The status of each format is stated: we do not sell what does not exist yet.

Graphics in your house style

The graphics on this page, adapted to your brand: print, web, social media, on-air graphics.

On request

Weekly data pack

Ahead of every matchday: probabilities for every fixture, updated projections and three written angles. A PDF and its source files.

On request

Data feeds

The same calculations in JSON: projected table, strengths, fixtures, calibration. For your competition pages and your apps.

On request

Embeddable widgets

A block to drop into an article that updates itself after every model run. Tell us which formats you need.

On request
How it works

From the latest matchday to your page.

A Dixon-Coles-type goals model, re-estimated after every matchday played. Nothing is adjusted by hand: what comes out of the model is what you publish.

01

The matches are played

The model re-estimates every team’s attack and defence from results across the whole competition.

02

The model simulates

Each fixture gets its own score grid; the rest of the season is replayed 50,000 times.

03

The model checks itself

Calibration — forecast against outcome — is recomputed and published as it stands.

04

You receive

Files, graphics or feeds, dated and credited “Source: Rondo Research”.

Why cite us

A figure you can stand behind.

  • The methodology is public. Team strengths, score matrix, simulations: every step is described, so your readers can judge it for themselves.
  • Calibration is published. When we say 30%, it should happen three times in ten — and the chart alongside shows that it does, across 2,094 matches.
  • Every figure is dated. A graphic always carries the date of the model run it comes from: no out-of-date figure picked up by mistake.
  • The scope is stated. Domestic cups are not modelled, and some leagues have no projection: we say so rather than publish a wrong figure.
Reliability · what the model forecasts against what happens
01000100%Forecast probabilityForecast 8.3% → observed 0.0% · 7 casesForecast 15.5% → observed 9.9% · 71 casesForecast 25.8% → observed 25.0% · 156 casesForecast 35.3% → observed 31.9% · 360 casesForecast 45.2% → observed 43.5% · 855 casesForecast 53.7% → observed 53.3% · 396 casesForecast 64.2% → observed 67.7% · 164 casesForecast 74.5% → observed 87.7% · 57 casesForecast 83.8% → observed 88.5% · 26 casesForecast 90.6% → observed 100.0% · 2 cases

Each point is a probability band; its size is the number of cases. On the diagonal, the model keeps its word. Here, across 2,094 matches (1X2 result), the mean gap between forecast and observed is 2.3%.

By type of media

One model, five ways to tell it.

Newspapers and magazinesDailies, weeklies, monthlies

The Saturday preview, the mid-season projection, the “who goes down” feature. A full-column graphic and a figure for the headline.

Example: each contender’s title probability, opening the sports section.

Television and radioPreviews, studio shows, regular slots

A figure the presenter can say in one sentence, and on-screen graphics that show it. Our modellers can explain it in the studio.

Example: the probability of each outcome, summed up in one line before going live to the ground.

Websites and appsCompetition pages, live coverage, match pages

Probabilities on every match page and a projected table on every league page, powered by a data feed.

Example: a “what the model says” module under every fixture.

NewslettersMorning briefings, themed newsletters

A graphic of the week and three lines of analysis, ready to paste in. The data pack is built for that rhythm.

Example: “the table is lying” every Monday, after the matchday.

Podcasts and videoShows, short formats

Angles to fuel a discussion, and a guest who can explain why the model thinks what it thinks.

Example: the most underrated team in the league, with the numbers to back it up.

A matchday, a derby or a run-in to cover?

Tell us the competition, the angle and the deadline. We will come back to you with the figures and a sample graphic, sourced and ready to publish.